Prison Overcrowding Crisis Unhealthy for All Californians

New America Media, Commentary, Donna Willmott, Posted: Dec 04, 2008

Editor's note: California prisons have become the largest mental health system for the poor, the largest battered women's shelter, and the largest system of public housing, observes NAM contributing writer, Donna Willmott, M.P.H. Willmott is the Family Advocacy Coordinator at Legal Services for Prisoners with Children and teaches in the Health Education and Community Health Studies Department of City College of San Francisco.

As a public health professional who has spent over 10 years advocating for prisoners' rights, I am dismayed to see the health of prisoners once again become a political football.

More than two years ago, the federal courts acknowledged what every prisoner in California already knew – that there has been an "unconscionable degree of suffering and death" in our prisons. With all due respect to those who are working under the federal receivership to reform prison medical care, most of the systemic issues that underlie substandard care have, in our clients' experience, remained essentially unchanged. While the Receivership has succeeded in hiring a new cadre of qualified medical providers, the fact remains that progress has been painfully slow for the 178,000 prisoners trapped in this system, and many will continue to suffer needlessly in the meantime.

overcrowdingOvercrowding is at the root of this paralysis. The Receivership proposes to build 10,000 new medical and mental health beds, at a construction cost to taxpayers of over $7 billion dollars. Even if this project had the support of the legislature and received the required money, the crisis would not be solved. It's not possible to build and maintain these facilities, then recruit and retain sufficient numbers of well-trained staff for this constantly expanding enterprise without bankrupting the state. Without shrinking the prison system, it will be impossible to provide the required constitutional level of medical care to prisoners.

Decades of failed public policy frame this crisis. Years of a tough-on-crime approach have spelled disaster for the health and well-being of poor people and people of color who are incarcerated at dramatically disproportionate rates. We have tried to use prisons as an answer to social problems, with devastating results. Our prisons have become the largest mental health system for the poor, the largest battered women's shelter, and the largest system of public housing. The social cost of decimating our already frayed safety net in order to expand prisons is beyond calculation. We sacrifice precious community resources to maintain a prison system that creates instability, ill health and disease, while failing to keep us safe.

Perhaps taking a page from history will help us envision a new solution to this crisis. Over 150 years ago, Rudolf Virchow, the founder of "social medicine," was sent by the German government to report on the causes of a devastating 1848 typhus epidemic. Instead of recommending the simple solution of more doctors and more hospitals to avoid catastrophic loss of life in the future, Virchow called for full employment, universal education, and agricultural cooperatives as the path to preventing future epidemics. He analyzed the root causes of the epidemic, and called for a fundamental reconstruction of society to create conditions in which people could be healthy.

If Virchow were with us today, it's likely that he would be horrified by the idea of building 10,000 beds for prisoners who are extremely frail or mentally ill, people whose incarceration couldn't possibly serve public safety. He would no doubt want us to put our resources into sentencing reform, releasing low-risk prisoners, redirecting our state budget towards universal healthcare, quality public education, training and employment opportunities, and expanding drug treatment. In short, we should be ensuring the conditions in which people can be healthy as the basis for safe communities.

If Californians continue to pour billions into massive incarceration, it will mean more pink slips to school teachers, more children turned away from their doctors, more seniors denied in-home aid, more families forced into poverty and homelessness. What will it take to bring health care to California prisoners? It'll take a new way of looking at crime and punishment, a fundamental shift in our priorities and a commitment to social equity as the foundation for public safety. Bricks and mortar can't solve this one.

Related stories

California Youth Defeat ‘Lock ‘em Up’ Politics

In California Ex-Felons Can Vote

California Props. 6 & 9 Bad Deals say LA Activists

San Bernardino County Ranks 11th in Prison Rates

America's Prisons Hold More Than 1.5 Million




Page 1 of 1

Share/Save/Bookmark

User Comments


Jacqueline Armitage on Dec 06, 2008 at 19:07:40 said:

I believe that especially with our economy is our tax payers including myself we should quit wasting my tax dollars on housing people who smoke marijuana for especially You people in charge need to act with a little common sense and quit worrying about these extra officers that really wouldnt be needed if you reduced prison housing would actually helping our economy and our ability to put our money all over California instead of only putting it only in correctional officer\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\'s pockets. I don\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\'t believe we would spend a very large percentage of our states money on people who dont need supervision to live on the outside. If people dont hurt others then they shouldn\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\'t caged up. You are delegating my taxes


rich mckone on Dec 05, 2008 at 08:57:59 said:

The Governor has frequently reported prisons were operating at over 200% of “design capacity”, a shortage of about 66,000 beds. The Legislative Analysist, relying on national prison bed standards requiring single celling only for inmates classified as being too dangerous for double-celling, reported a 16,600 bed shortage. Permanent bed capacity is about 156,500 beds and design capacity is about 90,050 beds.

Relying on design capacity, the State has decided to spend $6.5 billion for prison construction. Using the LAO criteria, prison overcrowding could be eliminated by simply increasing correctional contract beds from the low 4% of permanent capacity to 7%, eliminating the need to spend any money for construction.

Which standard would voters prefer?


Frank Courser on Dec 04, 2008 at 08:21:42 said:

I could not agree more! Because of tough on crime laws such as three strikes we have jammed our prisons.1/4 of the prison population are strikers serving double time or 25 to life.57% of those were for non-violent offenses.We spend 1 billion dollars each year to warehouse 4,000 non- violent offenders sentenced to life! The costs are ever increasing and the money to support the prisons comes from the general fund that also supports education! So we steal from education to keep our prisons full! This backwards and unamerican thinking is killing the future of our children.Our legislators must solve this problem now or we will be faced with billions more debt and a less educated generation.

-->

ADVERTISEMENT


Just Posted

Precious Pathologies

Nov 20, 2009

NAM Coverage

Criminal Justice

ADVERTISEMENT

Advertisements on our website do not necessarily reflect the views or mission of New America Media, our affiliates or our funders.