The 'Birther' Movement Won’t Go Away, and for Good Reason

New America Media, Commentary, Earl Ofari Hutchinson, Posted: Jul 30, 2009

White House Press Secretary Robert Gibbs got it right. He bluntly said that those who are adamant that President Obama is an illegal alien and should be dumped from the White House will never go away.

Unfortunately not only won’t the "birthers" go away, but in recent weeks they’ve gained even more steam, ironically with the unintended help of birther opponents. Newspapers, magazines, and talk show hosts may ridicule them as a bunch of wacky, paranoid people but the birthers only stand to benefit from this attention.

There’s a calculated and politically cynical motive behind their Obama birth certificate agitation.

The clamor for Obama to produce his original birth document gained a noisy following long before the final presidential vote tally was in last November. It started the instant that he declared his presidential candidacy in February 2007. Take your pick: He was too black. He was not patriotic enough. He was too liberal, too effete, too untested. He was a Muslim, terrorist fellow traveler, and a closet black radical. The shock of an Obama in the White House was simply too much for many to bear. Obama defied the stereotypical textbook look and definition of what an American president was supposed to look like, and be like: namely a middle-aged white male.

Obama inadvertently gave ammunition to the incipient birthers during a campaign stop in late July 2007 when he quipped that he did not look like all those other presidents on the dollar bills. Obama got torched for saying the obvious and that was that his candidacy was different.

Obama later admitted that it was a racial reference. The off-the-cuff remark simply reinforced the point that he and his candidacy marked a turning point in U.S. presidential politics and, by extension, race relations.

The Obama birth certificate hounders kicked their rumor-mongering campaign against him into even higher gear when some mainstream papers found the birth certificate controversy good copy. The birthers spotted the opening and crudely cloaked themselves in the mantle of concerned citizens and legal experts who had no personal, political, let alone racial, ax to grind with Obama. Their sole goal, they claimed, was to insure electoral truth and accuracy, to make sure that all the legal requirements for holding a presidential office were met, and to head off a constitutional crisis.

They even promised that they would put the matter to rest if Obama simply produced the original birth certificate.

That was a lie. The birthers got an open boost from GOP ultra-conservatives, led by House Representative John Campbell, who are pushing for a bill that requires all future presidential candidates to produce their original birth certificates. That, of course, would apply to Obama as well when he presumably runs for reelection in 2012. The real value of the birther movement is that it’s a tailored backdoor movement that can be used to destabilize the Obama administration. At the very least, it keeps the president off balance on policy initiatives he’s pushing on health care, the economy, and a softer foreign policy outreach -- all policies fiercely opposed by ultra-conservatives.

Since Obama’s inauguration, dozens of YouTube clips have been produced on the controversy. While legions of Web sites continue to recycle the rumor line about his birth certificate, and whether the birth certificate that Hawaii produced is legitimate, more than two dozen lawsuits or petitions have been filed in various state courts contesting Obama’s U.S. citizenship. (One of them was filed by political gadfly Alan Keyes.)

The Supreme Court’s refusal to demand that Obama pony up his birth certificate has done absolutely nothing to take any steam out of the movement. If anything, it probably added some vapor to it, by convincing more people that the courts are in cahoots with the Obama White House to keep the real “truth” about his imagined foreign birth secret from the American people.

The worst thing about the controversy over Obama’s birth certificate is not that CNN’s Lou Dobbs has latched onto the issue for ratings and to make mischief against Obama. Or that others in the media have even dignified the controversy by treating it as if it’s a legitimate issue. The worst thing is that none have connected the dots and seen the birthers as the shock troops to torpedo Obama’s political agenda.

Their hope is that by sowing enough conspiracy paranoia about him, they can do just that.


Related Articles:

What if Henry Louis Gates Were Not an Acclaimed Professor?

Why Some Black Leaders 'Hate' President Obama

Page 1 of 1

Share/Save/Bookmark

User Comments


Adam on Aug 06, 2009 at 16:12:00 said:

A simpler solution for Obama would be for him to release his mother's admission records from Kapi'olani (or Queens--if that's where he's claiming he was born this week). He could even make quite a photo-op of this, at the hospital, touting his healthcare plan.

While some bigots might take issue with his 'race' (although he's also 'white') or supposed secret Muslim status (bowing to King Abdullah didn't help THOSE rumours), most of the anti-B.O. crowd have more tangible issues with him. Being the Presidential protege of the likes of Chicago Mayor Richard M[obster] Daley doesn't sit well with many people.


Jack on Aug 04, 2009 at 23:27:08 said:

As Mr. Mango said: "Obama was born in Hawaii of a Kansas mother." For all those "Birthers" could any of you produce what you call a "long form vault birth certificate" I don't think such thing exists. I know I couldn't produce mine or my childrens'. I hope you Right Wingers expend all your energy on this inane argument.


Karen Ann on Aug 04, 2009 at 12:38:28 said:

Led by Todd Palin and Rick Perry -- perhaps Alaska and Texas should secede from the union after all.

Then, all the birthers can take the opportunity to move to Texasland and Alaskaland, autonomous nations unto themselves, where they can have a government of lily white representatives representing their lily white arses. (I can say that because I'm lily white.)

And the rest of us can get on with our lives under the government we elected to serve us.


Jack on Aug 04, 2009 at 07:43:03 said:

"Birth Certificate" argument has always been stupid. It just figures that the far right hangs on to another vestige of stupidity.


Charles Mango on Aug 04, 2009 at 07:18:08 said:

Obama was born in Hawaii of a Kansas mother. What else does he have to prove? I guess you would have to doubt all the Americans born of a Kansas mother, since the argument follows that it doesn't guarantee US citizenship.


Jsmith on Aug 03, 2009 at 11:15:59 said:

Note to Devon: "Panama John McCain" provided his birth certificate and his eligibility to run was determined by Congress -- nothing concealed at all. On the other hand, apparently BHO has spent enough to fund another stimulus package concealing nearly all historical records about his life -- if he had been as open as Senator McCain there would be no "birther" controversy.


richard harrigman on Jul 31, 2009 at 18:33:28 said:

You wrote that "They even promised that they would put the matter to rest if Obama simply produced the original birth certificate. That was a lie. "

Question: How can it be a "lie", if he has never produced the long form "vault" birth certificate? I'd love to hear the explanation to that.

He hides it because he can. You defend him because you want to believe in him. I on the other hand, at this point in time want proof because he clearly has demonstrated a desire to conceal a benign document. Didn't he say that he want transparency?


Sydney Goddard on Jul 31, 2009 at 06:20:54 said:

You would think that after the mess the same people made of the Clinton presidency that it would take little to figure this one out.


Devon Marsh on Jul 30, 2009 at 17:00:07 said:

Good thing Panama John McCain isn't in the Oval Office!

-->

ADVERTISEMENT


Just Posted

NAM Coverage

Immigration

ADVERTISEMENT

Advertisements on our website do not necessarily reflect the views or mission of New America Media, our affiliates or our funders.