- 2012elections - 9/11 Special Coverage - aca - africanamericanalzheimers - aids - Alabama News Network - american - Awards & Expo - bees - bilingual - border - californiaeducation - Caribbean - cir - citizenship - climatechange - collgeinmiami - community - democrats - ecotourism - Elders - Election 2012 - elections2012 - escuelas - Ethnic Media in the News - Ethnicities - Events - Eye on Egypt - Fellowships - food - Foreclosures - Growing Up Poor in the Bay Area - Health Care Reform - healthyhungerfreekids - howtodie - humiliating - immigrants - Inside the Shadow Economy - kimjongun - Latin America - Law & Justice - Living - Media - memphismediaroundtable - Multimedia - NAM en Espaol - Politics & Governance - Religion - Richmond Pulse - Science & Technology - Sports - The Movement to Expand Health Care Access - Video - Voter Suppression - War & Conflict - 攔截盤查政策 - Top Stories - Immigration - Health - Economy - Education - Environment - Ethnic Media Headlines - International Affairs - NAM en Español - Occupy Protests - Youth Culture - Collaborative Reporting

Black Lawmakers under Ethics Spotlight

Washington AFRO , News Report, Zenitha Prince Posted: Nov 09, 2009

November 8, 2009) - Are seven investigations too many to be a coincidence?

All seven of the full-scale ethics investigations currently underway in the U.S. House of Representatives are focused on African-American lawmakersand it would be eight if the committee conducting the investigations hadnt deferred to the Justice Departments investigation involving Rep. Jesse Jackson Jr.

The disparity is beginning to raise some eyebrows.

I dont think they (Black lawmakers) are scaredtheyre upset. They think [Congressional Black Caucus] members are being singled out, Rep. Elijah Cummings, former chairman of the Congressional Black Caucus, told the AFRO.

I cant say there is an agenda behind this I just dont know, Cummings said. But when you have 435 members of Congress and the only ones under full-scale investigations are CBC members, it makes you wonder.

In late October, California Democrats Laura Richardson and Maxine Waters became the latest CBC members to fall under official ethical scrutiny.

The ethics committeeofficially the Committee on Standards of Official Conducton Oct. 29 announced its decision to probe allegations that Richardson failed to report real estate and income in her financial disclosure forms, and received preferential treatment from a lender in the foreclosure/loan modification agreement for her Sacramento home.

Waters, who is the chambers chief deputy whip and member of the powerful Financial Services and Judiciary committees, has drawn more press attention. The ethics panel said it is reviewing a possible conflict of interest in her request that then-Treasury Secretary Henry Paulson meet with the National Bankers Association. The trade organization represents minority-owned banks such as OneUnited Bank, in which Waters husband owned stock and previously served on the board of directors.

The congresswoman denounced the charges. In a March 13 statement, Waters said she had simply followed up on NBAs request by asking Paulson to schedule a meeting.

I did not attend the meeting, she wrote, and thus did not participate in the conversation. I am confident that as the investigation moves forward the panel will discover that there are no facts to support allegations that I have acted improperly.

Lester Spence, an associate professor of political science at Johns Hopkins University, said caucus members may be targeted for ethics probes because their violations are less egregious and thus easier to prove.

Related Articles:

Echoing Obama, Harlem Banker Seeks to Defeat Rangel

Underground Economy is the Engine in Poor Neighborhoods

Illinois or South Asia, Political Corruption is Universal

Page 1 of 1

-->




Advertisement


ADVERTISEMENT


Just Posted

NAM Coverage

U.S. Politics