Finding Iris Chang

An Interview with Paula Kamen

New America Media, Q&A, Andrew Lam, Posted: Dec 31, 2007

Three days before Iris Chang, best-selling author of "The Rape of Nanking," committed suicide, she contacted Paula Kamen, one of her closest friends. Chang was 36 and had much to live for - fame, fortune, beauty, a loving husband, caring parents, and a beautiful new baby. Seeking to reconcile Chang's seemingly perfect life with her mysterious suicide, Kamen scoured correspondences, diaries, archival material as well as her own memories. The result is Finding Iris Chang, a suspenseful investigation into a writer's journey and mental illness. Kamen spoke with NAM editor Andrew Lam, author of Perfume Dreams: Reflections on the Vietnamese Diaspora.


Tell me about your friendship with Iris Chang.

I met Iris when we were both in college at the University of Illinois, and it started off more as a rivalry, where actually she was my rival, not the other way around. She always seemed to beat me out of every kind of internship, or any kind of journalism opportunity that came along; she always seemed to be there before me. But then after college we met up and slowly became close friends, and both of us were writing books and I really grew to completely appreciate her talent and all of her hard work.


But it’s not easy to like her immediately; you described how exhausting it could be to be in her presence.

Yes, she was extremely intense - that just a minimum phone conversation would be a few hours on the phone. And she wouldn’t even take hints to get off the phone. If someone would say, “Oh, I have to go to the bathroom; I have to get off,” she would say, “Oh, how long will it take you?” and then the person would say “10 minutes,” and then she’d say, “Oh, I’ll call you back in 10 minutes,” and then call back in 10 minutes and talk for another hour. Her husband said that she has something he affectionately called ‘Attention Surplus Disorder’- where she was so focused and just couldn’t be distracted at all.

But was it always that way or did she develop this over time?

She was always very intense, did nothing halfway, was extremely focused, but in retrospect I see that as some kind of mania, she was diagnosed in the last few weeks of her life with bipolar disorder. So that intensity is somewhat of a sign of that, but full-blown bipolar disorder has usually some kind of psychosis attached to it - it isn’t just the moods being up or down - and she didn’t seem to be out of touch with reality until the last several years of her life, and mostly in the last several months of her life.

She called you the night before she killed herself?

It was three days before she committed suicide and I picked up the phone, and her voice - I had never heard it that way. It was just totally drained, exhausted, every word was a huge struggle to get out. She sounded obviously extremely depressed. She talked about a lot of fears that she had… She also told me to let people know how she was before her “sickness.” She never mentioned depression or bipolar disorder; she just acknowledged that she’d been sick the last several months.

And how did you feel about that conversation? Basically, you didn’t have a clue at that point.

It was very odd. I knew there was something wrong with her, definitely, but I didn’t realize what it was, that it was a goodbye call, basically, that at that point it was carefully planned: the suicide. She had bought three guns, she had decided exactly when and where she was going to do it, and part of putting her affairs in order was calling her friends. I had no idea just how dire - I knew it was very odd, and I had a feeling she was in some kind of trouble just because she did sound paranoid and so disturbed. But, yeah, it was a total shock three days later when I found out about the suicide.

How exactly did she die and where was she?

It’s a terrible story. She lived in San Jose and she took her car and drove in the middle of the night to the side of the highway in Los Gatos. There’s a book called “Final Exit” that she had bought, that actually tells you how to kill yourself. This is actually not an obscure book. I went on Amazon to get it and it was in the top few thousand books on Amazon and it tells you exactly what to do and she followed it to the letter: to go in a car, to have a police officer, not your family, find you. And she had bought three guns.

It was very shocking news when it came out because from a reader's point of view she was at the top of her game. When she killed herself, I think it came as a shock to practically everyone who knew something of her.

Yes, it was one of the biggest shocks of my life, too, that we all, all of her friends, saw her as the most envied and enviable person that we knew. She was perfect, almost to an extreme extent, where she was beautiful, rich, and famous. She had all this glamour. Hillary Clinton invited her for a private meeting at the White House. She had a wonderful husband, a two-year old son, very close parents, and so it didn’t seem to make any sense. And this is the reason why I wrote the book - that this most envied person would do this - and to understand more of the mental illness that was basically at the root of it, that is so misunderstood in our society. That so many people did not pick up, there were clear signs that Iris was showing that people didn’t pick up on, so I’m hoping in showing those signs, this could be avoided in others.

You mentioned that when you started looking into the story, you were kind of scared yourself, feeling haunted because you say, basically if this can happen to Iris, this can happen to anybody, including yourself.

Yes. That is what so many of her fellow journalists thought, that she was so much more together than we are, so why are we any different from her? I have sort of an intense personality too, and I’ve covered a lot of dark topics as a journalist, so it did worry me. But it seemed like the more facts I got about mental illness, the less worried that I was.

I saw that it wasn’t entirely her dark topics. Her best-selling book “The Rape of Nanking” was about these horrible atrocities the Japanese committed. In the last few years of her life she was interviewing non-stop U.S. GIs who had been tortured by the Japanese in the Philippines. So, I found that these dark topics did exacerbate her depression, but it wasn’t at the root of it. At the root of it was the mental illness, and the more I found out about the mental illness, the less I feared the dark topics.

In writing “Finding Iris Chang,” did you find anything in your digging that was surprising about her?

Yes. It was almost everyday; there were twists and turns. There’s a lot of things I couldn’t make up. I found out that a lot her fears were based in some reality.

She felt guilty that she had “given” her son autism when actually she was picking up on some real signs of autism from her son at that time. He was later diagnosed with a milder form of it. So it wasn’t rational to say, “I caused it,” but it was based in some reality. Then I found out too, that she had a lot of troubles with infertility and I remember her telling me about doing a lot of fertility treatments which involve a lot of heavy drugs. I investigated that and saw that the onset of the bipolar disorder happened at the beginning of that process of trying to have a kid in ’99. I didn’t realize all the struggle she had gone through to have a kid and when someone is prone to bipolar disorder, just how sensitive they are to hormonal fluctuation, which she was having in her effort to have a kid.
How much of her being Chinese American or Asian American contributed to the misdiagnosis of her illness? You mention in the book that she didn’t act out in the way that you would expect someone to act out.

Right. I didn’t realize this either, until working at it, that just culturally, Asian people, generally, can manifest mania much differently than a white person. There is a much narrower range of acceptable behaviors.

Like what?

For example, this is really boiling it down, but the classic symptoms for a white person at the manic level is promiscuity and shopping: having sex with tons of people randomly, going shopping, racking up debts. You wouldn’t see that as much in an Asian person even in their most unhinged state.

Why is that?

There is just a much narrower range of acceptable behavior. For an Asian person, what would seem very excited, to a white person, could just seem a little excited. Iris’s husband was white, so I could see him watching her. Of course she was excited, had insomnia, but it wasn’t the total recklessness he might see in a white person.

This woman moved her career forward and met with all these luminaries, yet the word naïve is constantly being used to describe her.

Yes, it’s interesting. She had an innocence about her. In hearing about the rape of Nanking and these atrocities, she just couldn’t hear about it and not act, where maybe someone else would’ve been more hardened and be like, “Well, it was sad, but atrocities happen.” But it was like she was so innocent, hearing about evil for the first time. Every time she heard about an atrocity that was committed, it would be like the first time she ever heard it. She never became ironic about it. A lot of us journalists use black humor to get through the day. She would never do that.

Has the family read the book and what are their feelings?

Her husband, who helped me a lot, asked to see a pre-published version of the book last spring, and so did her parents. Her parents didn't help me. They both agreed that I had portrayed her accurately. I was worried because, just like I portrayed myself as very human, I portrayed her as very human.

Chinese related stories

Health related stories

Articles by Andrew Lam

Listen to the radio interview on Upfront

Page 1 of 1

Share/Save/Bookmark

User Comments


Winona Romero on Jan 20, 2008 at 18:09:44 said:

I should also mention that Kamen's "analysis" is full of overt stereotyping if not straight up racist. Kamen says that white people manifest bipolar symptoms such as:

"...promiscuity and shopping: having sex with tons of people randomly, going shopping, racking up debts."

Apparently, Asian people are completely different in this regard...even those that have grown up in America. Kamen says:

"For an Asian person, what would seem very excited, to a white person, could just seem a little excited. Iris’s husband was white, so I could see him watching her. Of course she was excited, had insomnia, but it wasn’t the total recklessness he might see in a white person."

Let me get this straight, Ms. Kamen: having sex with multiple partners and spending too much money is bipolar for a white person. As for an Asian person, being a "little excited" is a sure sign of bipolar.

Uh huh.

Ms. Kamen, no one is buying this nonsense; just read the rest of the comments on this page.

Iris Chang single-handedly brought Nanking back in to the consciousness of the world. Your little "biography" will never change that, Ms. Kamen.


Richard Chou on Jan 17, 2008 at 00:30:50 said:

Ms. Kamen's book raises more questions about Paula's agenda then to help finding her close friend.


Winona Romero on Jan 10, 2008 at 17:30:35 said:

I was embarrassed to read Paula Kamen's book about her "friend" Iris Chang. Iris kept telling Paula about what was going on but obviously Paula has an agenda. So what does Paula do to honor her "friend"? She writes a book describing Iris as having a poorly functioning brain. Or an imbalance -- whatever the doctors make up. There are no chemical or blood test for any psych "diseases." In fact, they aren't diseases at all. It's just rich doctors, backed by billionaire dollar pharmacies, making behavior judgments. That's all. Complete farce! Of course Iris didn't want to take their drugs -- she's too smart for that.

After I was done with Paula's hit job of a book all I could think was what the book says about Paula: "here is a woman who is terrified of death." But there is one major difference between Paula and Iris: Iris is a warrior whose spirit lives on.

Thank you, Iris. I hope to speak with you someday in another realm.


idy gaff on Jan 06, 2008 at 08:23:32 said:

iris was a heroine whose meticulous dedication to exposing the truth that is not popular with historical revisionists in japan left all truthseekers with deep respect and gratitude for her life's work and courage to go against political correctness.


Maria Mo on Jan 04, 2008 at 14:55:59 said:

It seems that Iris' "friend" Kamen is an opportunistic journalist who attempted to bring fame onto herself through pretending to write a book about Iris so that she can help others.

She used her "friendship" as a selling point, posting to be a close friend of Iris. If in fact she is a close friend, perhaps she will respect Iris a little more than writing a book about Iris with facts not verified.

Because Iris is famous, she can use her name to advance her own (Paula) career.

Even though I know neither parties, this just seems really obvious to me, as a general NAM reader.


Pete on Jan 03, 2008 at 17:54:30 said:

This book sounds a bit like an attempt to cover up something.


Peter Stanek on Dec 31, 2007 at 15:59:19 said:

The "Rape of Nanking Redress Coalition" (RNRC) takes our name from the brilliant work of Iris Chang. Working with her through the last years of her life, we came to know Iris as a true professional, dedicated to exploring and exposing the truth. Our goal, like Iris's, is to secure a Japanese government apology and repayment to victims of the Japanese Imperial Army atrocities committed against unarmed, defenseless citizens on the Asian mainland who were sacrificed in Japan's quest for world domination.

This then is the meaning of Iris's life: A search for ultimate resolution of the horrors worked by the Japanese Imperial Army, and ultimate restoration of basic human rights for us all. Speculation about the reasons for and circumstances surrounding her death are just that: speculation. The most obvious thing, which speaks for itself, is the global impact Iris generated by her work, through which we have discovered for ourselves the terrible history of Japan and of the Pacific War.


Ying-Ying and Shau-Jin Chang on Dec 31, 2007 at 10:02:22 said:

Paula’s answer to Andrew Lam's last question, “…They (Iris’ parents) both agreed that I had portrayed her accurately” which is NOT correct or truthful.

As we learned about the publication of Paula’s book in early June, 2007, we immediately asked for a review copy. We received a bound gallery copy from her editor on June 7 and quickly read it in two days. Paula told us that we only had one week to add or correct anything in the book by June 15.

We found many errors and factual mistakes in the book. However, we could only ask Paula to correct the major mistakes due to the extremely limited amount of time before review deadline. There was no way we could change her conclusion on Iris’ mental state when the book was about to be published in a week, therefore all we could tell Paula was that she did not know all the facts surrounding Iris’ life. When Paula did not know all the facts, she reached a different conclusion.

We had serious doubts that Iris had bipolar disorder as mentioned in Paula's book. The diagnosis of the last doctor of Iris was premature because Iris died a week after the diagnosis and there was no time to confirm it. There are so many facts about
Iris which Paula did not know. That is why one of us (yyc) shall write a true story of Iris's life to correct the many misunderstandings that had surrounded her life.

It should be noted that Kamen asked us for an interview a few months after Iris’ death. It was at a time that Iris’ death was so painful and fresh and we were not able to grant an interview to anyone. That was the only time she requested for an interview.

Sincerely,
Ying-Ying and Shau-Jin Chang
Parents of Iris Chang


tony lee on Dec 31, 2007 at 06:04:46 said:

ms. ding's observations about ms. kamen's lack of research thoroughness is a valid journalistic critique from a person who appears to have had a degree of intimate knowledge of iris chang. why ms. kamen wrote biograhical material without exhaustively investigating valid sources may speak more to her motives for writing the book than about her journalistic veracity - to which we may only surmise.

if ms. kamen's purpose was to do from iris' death what she could not do while they were competitors then as an envying "close" friend (ironic) - then she indeed has made this apparently "perfect" person not only fall to earth but has used the banner of mental illness not to show the humanity of iris' plight, but may have been a subconscious stab to even the score of coming in second in their common academic and journalistic goals - a hidden form of professional jealosy that deprives the runner up a sense of social validation.

knowing little about iris and her personal plight and drive to be the best she could be, apparently feeling guilt for her son's apparent autism may have contributed to iris' suicide (and the irony is that diagnosing autism at 2 years of age may in the long run turn out to be inaccurate as her son may grow up to be "normal" in later years) - the public will reflect on iris' legacy not for her prolific genius and goodness of heart, but that she was bipolar... crazy. what a shame.


Ignatius Ding on Dec 31, 2007 at 01:43:00 said:

It appears that Paula Kamen drew her conclusion from mostly unsubstantiated speculation and limited interviews with individuals who were not familiar with Iris’ work and activism in her thriving career which had major effect of changes in her, her personal and professional growth, and most critically her state of mind and physical well-being.

None of her colleagues and close associates in the Chinese American community, historians, scholars or her editors was interviewed for the book as to how her passionate and dedicated work had impacted and effectively consumed her. Some of us kept very close contact with Iris in the ten years of her work on human rights issues and research of historical subjects. We have never heard from Kamen since she attended Iris’ funeral in Los Altos in November 2004 which I personally arranged on behalf of her family.

The claim of Iris suffering from bipolar disorder in the book was based on a preliminary and unconfirmed diagnose of a single physician only a week before Iris’ tragic death. It should be known that there were also other medical opinions offered by other doctors, such as temporary psychosis. Iris was totally exhausted from lack of sleep, food and rest for an extended period of time. It seems that Kamen knew nothing and did not look at all into what had happened in the days leading to Iris’ demise. Consequently, Kamen’s book was derived more from opinions and perception than concrete and verifiable facts.

Since Kamen intends to “find Iris Chang,” she should have known one of the great strength of her subject, i.e. Iris, is thorough investigation, documenting, verifying and analyzing findings with rigorousness. She would have learned something from this book project if she indeed did.

-->

ADVERTISEMENT


Just Posted

Precious Pathologies

Nov 20, 2009

NAM Coverage

Health

ADVERTISEMENT

Advertisements on our website do not necessarily reflect the views or mission of New America Media, our affiliates or our funders.