- 2012elections - 9/11 Special Coverage - aca - africanamericanalzheimers - aids - Alabama News Network - american - Awards & Expo - bees - bilingual - border - californiaeducation - Caribbean - cir - citizenship - climatechange - collgeinmiami - community - democrats - ecotourism - Elders - Election 2012 - elections2012 - escuelas - Ethnic Media in the News - Ethnicities - Events - Eye on Egypt - Fellowships - food - Foreclosures - Growing Up Poor in the Bay Area - Health Care Reform - healthyhungerfreekids - howtodie - humiliating - immigrants - Inside the Shadow Economy - kimjongun - Latin America - Law & Justice - Living - Media - memphismediaroundtable - Multimedia - NAM en Espaol - Politics & Governance - Religion - Richmond Pulse - Science & Technology - Sports - The Movement to Expand Health Care Access - Video - Voter Suppression - War & Conflict - 攔截盤查政策 - Top Stories - Immigration - Health - Economy - Education - Environment - Ethnic Media Headlines - International Affairs - NAM en Español - Occupy Protests - Youth Culture - Collaborative Reporting

Will the Next War for Oil Be in Africa?

San Francisco Bay View, News Report, Antonia Juhasz Posted: Jul 03, 2008

The number of Americans who believe that the war in Iraq was a mistake has surpassed the number who felt the same way about Vietnam during that war. At the same time, a much quieter U.S. military build-up is underway on another continent. The ultimate objective of the two efforts is the same: securing Big Oils access to the regions oil. The impact in Africa will likely be the same as in Iraq: perpetual occupation, instability and growing anti-Americanism.

In recognition of the emerging strategic importance of Africa, in February 2007 President Bush ordered the creation of AFRICOM, the U.S. Africa Command. AFRICOM, like CENTCOM (Central Command) and EUCOM (European Command), centralizes all authority for the U.S. military operating in the African region under one command structure. AFRICOM also transfers many duties that previously belonged to nonmilitary U.S. agencies such as building schools and digging wells to the jurisdiction of the Department of Defense.

While fighting terrorism in Africa is the primary reason given for the establishment of AFRICOM, oil appears to be the more pressing motivator. A key mission for U.S. forces [in Africa] would be to insure that Nigerias oilfields, which in the future could account for as much as 25 percent of all U.S. oil imports, are secure, explains Gen. Charles Wald, deputy commander of U.S. forces in Europe in an interview with Wall Street Journal writer Greg Jaffe.

To secure and maintain access to oil if not for the nation, then most certainly for our oil companies the Bush administration has increasingly turned toward the U.S. military. Author Kevin Phillips coined the term petrol-imperialism to describe the Bush administrations policies in this regard, the key aspect of which is the U.S. militarys transformation into a global oil protection force.

Under the rubric of the Global War on Terror, the Bush administration has implemented the greatest realignment of U.S. forces since the end of the Cold War. With a map of Big Oils overseas operations, the worlds remaining oil reserves, and oil transport routes, one can now track the realignment and predict future deployments of the U.S. military.

Africa, with almost 10 percent of the worlds remaining oil, is an area of increasing activity for both Big Oil and the U.S. military. Between 2000 and 2007, U.S. imports of oil from Africa increased by 65 percent, from 1.6 to 2.7 million barrels a day, according to the U.S. Department of Energy. These imports, in turn, accounted for a growing percentage of all U.S. oil imports: increasing from 14.5 percent in 2000 to 20 percent in 2007. Both trends are expected to accelerate in the future.

Not only is the United States importing more African oil, but U.S. oil companies are also increasing their African reserves and their presence on the continent. According to SEC tax filings, in 2000, ExxonMobil operated in just three African nations Angola, Equatorial Guinea and Nigeria and its production there was negligible relative to the rest of the world.

Today, ExxonMobil operates in Angola, Cameroon, Chad, Equatorial Guinea and Nigeria and is set to begin work in Libya. Its African holdings account for nearly 17 percent of the companys global oil reserves.

According to 2008 SEC tax filings, Chevron, ConocoPhillips and Marathon, among other U.S. oil companies, are also increasing their presence, with each operating in three or more of the following countries: Algeria, Angola, Cameroon, Chad, the Republic of Congo, the Democratic Republic of Congo, Equatorial Guinea, Gabon, Libya and Nigeria. According to U.S. Energy Secretary Samuel Bodman, U.S. companies hope to expand their operations further, with Madagascar, Benin, Sao Tome and Principe and Guinea-Bissau among potential future targets.

Shell and BP, both with large U.S. affiliates that are active in both U.S. political campaigns and domestic lobbying efforts, are also expanding their already sizeable African operations.

The Bush administration has increasingly turned to the Department of Defense to ensure more stable governments in Africa that are supportive of both the U.S. government and U.S. and U.S.-affiliated oil corporations and to guarantee an amenable some would argue, subdued populace. The administration has increased the provision of both arms and direct military services and training to Africa, such that today Angola, Algeria, Botswana, Chad, Cote dIvoire, the Republic of the Congo, Equatorial Guinea, Eritrea, Ethiopia, Gabon, Kenya, Mali, Mauritania, Niger, Nigeria, Sudan and Uganda are all direct recipients of such assistance.

Gen. James Jones, EUCOM commander, announced that U.S. Navy carrier battle groups would shorten future visits to the Mediterranean and spend half the time going down the west coast to Africa. The former French Foreign Legion base, Camp Lemonier in Djibouti, became home to the U.S. militarys Combined Joint Task Force Horn of Africa in 2003.

AFRICOM is currently headquartered in Germany but intends to establish a presence on the African continent this year. There are several options for new U.S. military bases, including a naval base and deepwater port on the tiny island of Sao Tome off the coast of Gabon, located in West Africa. The Pentagon is also considering new bases in Senegal, Ghana and Mali.

U.S. oil companies have long used African military and security forces to protect their oil interests. Perhaps it is more honest for the U.S. military to take more direct oversight over these operations.

But the risks far outweigh any potential benefit. The United States is already engaged in one war for oil in Iraq and the U.S. military knows this. Gen. John Abizaid, retired head of U.S. Central Command and military operations in Iraq, said of the war, Of course its about oil; we cant really deny that.

The concern is that, as it has in Iraq, a larger U.S. military presence in Africa will strain an already overburdened military while increasing internal hostilities, regional instability and anger at the United States.

The answer to our nations oil addiction is not to secure new and diverse suppliers. We need to kick the habit and just say no, beginning with AFRICOM.

Antonia Juhasz is a Foreign Policy In Focus Policy Analyst. She is an Associate Fellow with the Institute for Policy Studies and a Fellow with Oil Change International. Her new book, The Tyranny of Oil: the Worlds Most Powerful Industry, and What We Must Do To Stop It, will be released in October by HarperCollins Publishers.

Related Articles:

Ending the Violence in Kenya

Africa Wins One

AFRICOM: Wrong for Liberia, Disastrous for Africa

Page 1 of 1




Just Posted

NAM Coverage