- 2012elections - 9/11 Special Coverage - aca - africanamericanalzheimers - aids - Alabama News Network - american - Awards & Expo - bees - bilingual - border - californiaeducation - Caribbean - cir - citizenship - climatechange - collgeinmiami - community - democrats - ecotourism - Elders - Election 2012 - elections2012 - escuelas - Ethnic Media in the News - Ethnicities - Events - Eye on Egypt - Fellowships - food - Foreclosures - Growing Up Poor in the Bay Area - Health Care Reform - healthyhungerfreekids - howtodie - humiliating - immigrants - Inside the Shadow Economy - kimjongun - Latin America - Law & Justice - Living - Media - memphismediaroundtable - Multimedia - NAM en Espaol - Politics & Governance - Religion - Richmond Pulse - Science & Technology - Sports - The Movement to Expand Health Care Access - Video - Voter Suppression - War & Conflict - 攔截盤查政策 - Top Stories - Immigration - Health - Economy - Education - Environment - Ethnic Media Headlines - International Affairs - NAM en Español - Occupy Protests - Youth Culture - Collaborative Reporting

After Reid, Will Blacks Finally Question Democratic Party Leaders?

New America Media, Commentary, Jasmyne A. Cannick Posted: Jan 13, 2010

Democratic Senate Majority Leader Harry Reids characterization of then-candidate Barack Obamas chances to win the presidency because he is a light-skinned African-American with no Negro dialect well, was right. All Reid left out was the fact that Obama was male, because lets face it, that helped too that and the fact that he spoke English better than any other Black man who had ever run for President and didnt sport a perm or an Afro. What was wrong with that? That Reid shouldnt have ever said what he said publicly considering he is white and these types of statements cant help but come off as a bit racist?

I guess thats whats to be expected when Tyler Perry films get national distribution. All of Blacks most inner thoughts and kitchen table conversations are now out in the open for everyone to use. But I am not as much concerned about Reids statement as I am of Blacks continued willingness to support a Party that clearly still harbors unresolved race issues and a lack of racial etiquette as it relates to Blacks.

Etiquette as in, some things are better left unsaid by white Democratic Party leaders, lest they conjure up memories that Democrats would rather leave forgotten. An example is the now infamous inadequate Black man statement made at the Democratic National Committees rules and bylaws committee meeting by an angry Democratic Clinton supporter.

But as it relates to the truth of Reids comments, lets take a short trip back down memory lane.

In 1972, Shirley Chisholm, Black and female, unsuccessfully ran for president during her second term in the House of Representative. Then there was Lenora Branch Fulani, also Black and female, who ran for the presidency in 1988 and 1992 -- unsuccessfully. Jesse Jackson, well he was Black and male, but not so light-skinned and with a Negro dialect when he ran for president in 1984 and 1988.

Carol Mosely-Braun, another Black female announced her run for president at Howard University in Washington, D.C. in 2003. Her campaign barely got off the ground. Then in 2004 along come Al Sharpton who is Black, male, but again not so light-skinned, and with a heavy Negro dialect. He also lost. Former Black Panther leader Elaine Brown, another Black female, briefly ran for the Green Party presidential nomination in 2008. That was the last weve heard from her. Cynthia McKinney, Black and female, was nominated by the Green Party in 2008 for President of the United States. And then there was Barack Obama -- Black, male -- light-skinned, with no Negro dialect when ran for president on the Democratic ticket in 2008. He won.

Need I say more?

Politically correct or not the truth hurts and issues aside, what made Obamas candidacy so appealing to both Blacks and whites was that he was bi-racial. Whites werent so fearful because of his European heritage and Blackswell we felt like he was one of us. Plus it helped he had a Black wife.

Former Democratic vice presidential candidate Geraldine Ferraro pretty much echoed that sentiment when she told the Daily Breeze Newspaper in March 2008 that, if Obama was a white man, he would not be in this position. And if he was a woman (of any color) he would not be in this position. He happens to be very lucky to be who he is. And the country is caught up in the concept.

While I may not like what Reid or Ferraro said, there is some truth to their statements.

As Black people, we know that Blacks with lighter skin have always been treated better. In the days of slavery, the dark-skinned Blacks worked in the fields while light-skinned Blacks worked in the house, hence the terms field Negroes and house Negroes. It got so bad that not only did the slave owners, who were often responsible for the lighter shade of brown his slaves had, give lighter-skinned Blacks more respect, but so did the dark-skinned Blacks.

Not that much has changed today -- just look at Hollywood. Precious actor Gabourey Sidibe is an anomaly, but her characters fascination with being white, long straight hair, and dating a light-skinned brother is something that Black women still struggle with. Just ask your average inner city Korean beauty supply owner what color and type of hair they sell the mosthoney blonde silky straight.

But this isnt about Black peoples issues (and there are many) with our skin color. This is about the ongoing and ever prevalent anti-Black attitudes and covert racism among the Democratic Partys leaders and rank and file members -- the Party that Blacks claim as their own.

Its been 39 years since Congresswoman Shirley Chisholm and twelve other Democratic lawmakers founded the Congressional Black Caucus. Today, even though Democrats elected a Black President, and we have 42 members currently serving in the CBC, the Democratic Party itself has been and continues to be mostly white led.

From the DNC officers and Democratic Party organizational leadership, Black faces are few and far between on the leadership pages, which could explain the lingering pre-Reconstruction anti-Black attitudes among some white Democrats regarding Obamas ascendancy. Californias Democratic Party is a perfect example of this. There is only one African-American who is a Party officer while whites and gays run tings.

For far too long, Black voters have participated in political deference. The Democratic Party needs to be challenged on why minorities, females, and those under 30 are encouraged to vote, but not to lead, and why when they attempt to lead their voices are quickly drowned out. I need to know why its more of an asset in California to be a gay male or female in the Democratic Party than to be Black straight or gay.

Black Democrats need to flex their muscles when the Senator Reids of the world overstep their boundaries. This isnt about a distraction from health care; its about whether or not Black Democrats have the chutzpa to take on their white counterparts on issues of race and represent for the people who elected them into office.

While I may agree with Sen. Reids assessment, as a Party leader he had no business making that statement. We all know that had Sen. Reid been a Republican, it would have been off with his head. Allowing Reid to keep his position as a Democratic Party leader only reinforces the message that white Democrats still harbor pre-Reconstruction anti-Black attitudes and as Black Democrats were supposed to just go along to get along. I cant go for that.

Unexpected and unapologetically Black, at Jasmyne Cannick, 32, is a critic and commentator based in Los Angeles who writes about the worlds of pop culture, race, class, sexuality, and politics as it relates to the African-American community. She can be reached at www.jasmynecannick.com.

Related Articles:

Reid Spoke the Awful Truth about Obamas Racial Exceptionalism



Page 1 of 1

-->




Advertisement


ADVERTISEMENT


Just Posted

NAM Coverage

Race Relations