Mother-Son Asylum Seekers Pay High Cost in Separation

New America Media, Investigation, Julie Johnson, Posted: Jan 02, 2007

Editor's Note: Nigerian journalist Rosemary Okere is unwavering in her bid for asylum, but each day she sits in an immigration detention facility is another apart from her teenage son. Julie Johnson is a writer for New America Media.

Locked away in a detention center in Tacoma, Wash., Rosemary Okere, a Nigerian journalist, refuses to give up her and her son's bid for asylum in the United States.

On one side she faces death at the hands of her husband's killers if she is deported to Nigeria. But every day she spends behind bars -- she's been held for nearly one and a half years -- separates her from her teenage son, who is living with relatives outside of Tacoma. The cost of her prolonged absence is a deepening depression that led him to try to end his life last summer.

Rosemary Okere and her sonOn the other side is Nigeria, a country her son doesn't remember and where her life fell apart. She fears the impact of uprooting him from the only community he calls home and moving to a tumultuous and unfamiliar country.

It began, Okere says, with her husband's death in Lagos on May 15, 1991, where he was writing columns on economics for The Daily Times and other papers. Ambushed by a car full of uniformed police, he was shot in the chest with his arms raised, and his body taken by the police who sped away in their car.

Okere, who was with him and their driver at the scene, escaped uninjured. At 28 years old she filed a lawsuit against the government when she realized no actions would be taken against the officers who killed her husband. When she started getting death threats from men claiming to be her husband's killers, she went into hiding with her son for several years. She finally made it to the United States on a tourist visa in 1995 and applied for asylum.

But America's immigration judges are poorly equipped to evaluate information provided to them by asylum seekers -- especially from a country like Nigeria where political conflicts rarely make news in the United States.

Tim Sparapani, legislative council for the American Civil Liberties Union says "one of the great challenges is to provide judges with much more up-to-date, detailed information about all the extraordinary number of conflicts around the world. That kind of detailed information will allow judges to have a better perspective."

Okere's first asylum claim was rejected in 2002. The judge denied her case on the grounds that there was no proof her husband's death was politically motivated (he also denied 85 percent of all asylum cases he reviewed from 2000 to 2005 according to TRAC, a research organization that compiles information on enforcement activities of the federal government).

This in spite of testimony Okere provided that her husband had been detained and beaten by the police on three occasions. Each time they demanded he give up his sources and stop writing articles critical of the government.

Chris Albin-Lackey, a Washington, D.C.-based Nigerian researcher for Human Rights Watch, says the 1990s were a brutal period of military dictatorship in Nigeria. "Police were often ordered to target individuals and hire themselves out to commit crimes," he says.

Even the U.S. State Department's 1992 Report on Human Rights chapter on Nigeria mentions Mr. Okere's death as an example of how "many policemen guilty of extrajudicial killings go unpunished and unquestioned."

Okere filed an appeal but -- as happens to many in her situation -- she relied on an attorney who took her money but advised her she need not appear in person at a key hearing. Her petition was denied in absentia. When she filed a grievance against the attorney with the Washington State Bar Association -- which ruled in her favor -- he threatened to have her deported. Two weeks later, U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement apprehended her for deportation and she's been held without bail ever since.

Okere could end her incarceration by rescinding her appeal and submitting herself and her son to deportation. But Okere is determined to press her asylum claim. Right now she is waiting for another appeal that could bring the case in front of a different judge, a process that could take years.

Rosemary OkereMeanwhile, her son is becoming a tall, broad-shouldered high school student who dreams of playing college basketball. His mother's absence is hardest at times like his basketball games, when he sees parents cheer his teammates on. His aunt says she knows he's wishing his parents could be there, too. For Okere, it's a struggle to be a good mother over the phone or from behind the visiting room's glass wall.

"I don't blame the judge," says Okere of the judge who denied her asylum petition. "He doesn't understand what it's like in Nigeria."

But she firmly believes she will be killed if she returns.

Since Nigeria transitioned from military to civilian rule in 1999, things have improved slightly, says Albin-Lackey. But, he adds, "Nigeria is still a human rights disaster."

Earlier this year, Attorney General Alberto Gonzalez sent letters to all immigration judges and members of the Board of Appeals stating that he's "watched with concern the reports of immigration judges who fail to treat aliens appearing before them with appropriate respect and consideration and who fail to produce the quality of work that I expect from employees of the Department of Justice."

Gonzalez has since outlined a comprehensive review of the immigration courts that includes an immigration law exam all newly appointed judges must pass. Sparapani says there's been an "extraordinarily increase in number of cases going before federal judges" in the past few years and courts don't have "enough judges or court time to give cases the full due process and consideration they deserve."

It's doubtful these changes will come in time to help in Okere's case. But she is hopeful that her appeal will get her case heard before the Seattle courts, which are closer to home and where judges have more favorable records of granting asylum than those in Texas, where her initial case was heard.

Okere's struggles have impacted her health; she has high blood pressure, fainting spells and weight loss. She calls her son daily, sometimes even three times a day. "I want to let him know every day that I'm alive."



Page 1 of 1

Share/Save/Bookmark

User Comments


M/Kelly on Feb 18, 2007 at 09:36:12 said:

This case is outrageous. Where is the compassion of the judge. This is not a person who will harm the coutry and you leave a son without the confort and consel of his mother. The courts and the judges should be ashamed of themselves...give them entry and be done with it!!


Michael McGinnis on Feb 03, 2007 at 08:07:35 said:

Parrts of the stoty may or may not be true however the duty of the immegration judge is both the application of the law and to ;ook out for the best interestsw of the citizens of the United States. The article bears the slant of someone against the interests that the judge is worn to defend.


jharris on Jan 15, 2007 at 10:47:52 said:

This story is vicious, criminal and inhumane.


Shreya Mandal on Jan 02, 2007 at 05:42:57 said:

"Full due process and consideration" under the law requires that immigration judges explore more thoroughly mitigating factors in political asylum cases, similar to how one would ideally present thorough mitigation in a death penalty case. Otherwise innocent and law-abiding asylees may very well be deported back to death's door. In this respect, courts should develop a systematic practice of appointing mitigation specialists to asylum cases. The burden of staying knowledgeable about global political unrest and human rights violations should always lie with judges dealing with these matters of immigration.

-->

ADVERTISEMENT


Just Posted

NAM Coverage

International Affairs

ADVERTISEMENT

Advertisements on our website do not necessarily reflect the views or mission of New America Media, our affiliates or our funders.