- 2012elections - 9/11 Special Coverage - aca - africanamericanalzheimers - aids - Alabama News Network - american - Awards & Expo - bees - bilingual - border - californiaeducation - Caribbean - cir - citizenship - climatechange - collgeinmiami - community - democrats - ecotourism - Elders - Election 2012 - elections2012 - escuelas - Ethnic Media in the News - Ethnicities - Events - Eye on Egypt - Fellowships - food - Foreclosures - Growing Up Poor in the Bay Area - Health Care Reform - healthyhungerfreekids - howtodie - humiliating - immigrants - Inside the Shadow Economy - kimjongun - Latin America - Law & Justice - Living - Media - memphismediaroundtable - Multimedia - NAM en Espaol - Politics & Governance - Religion - Richmond Pulse - Science & Technology - Sports - The Movement to Expand Health Care Access - Video - Voter Suppression - War & Conflict - 攔截盤查政策 - Top Stories - Immigration - Health - Economy - Education - Environment - Ethnic Media Headlines - International Affairs - NAM en Español - Occupy Protests - Youth Culture - Collaborative Reporting

Supreme Court Gives Immigrants New Rights

RaceWire, News Analysis, Seth Freed Wessler Posted: Apr 01, 2010

The Supreme Court yesterday granted immigrants facing detention new rights and protections. The ruling in Padilla v. Kentucky requires defense attorneys to accurately advise their non-citizen clients of the potential immigration consequences of pleading guilty to a crime.

Under current law, deportation is the mandatory result of many criminal convictions, including minor ones like marijuana possession or shoplifting. Unknowingly, many immigrants, even green card holders, initiate their own deportation when they plea guilty in an attempt to secure a minimum punishment. Immigration and Customs Enforcement announced it is well on its way to deporting a record 150,000 people because of a conviction.

As things stand, American law does not consider deportation to be a punishment, but rather a civil sanction. As a result, the law does not consider deporting a person after they serve a criminal sentence to be double jeopardy.

While todays decision will do nothing to challenge thisthe court is far too conservative for a ruling of that kindthe decision, says Bill Hing, an immigration law professor at UC Davis, may have a very big impact.

Thats because most criminal convictions come as the result of a plea bargain. According to Hing, eighty to 90 percent of criminal cases result in a plea bargain and that means that its probably the case that 80 to 90 percent of people who are deported because of crimes probably also resulted from a plea bargain. Now, all immigrants who enter a plea agreement must be aware of the full range of possible consequences.

As of today, says Hing, what an immigration lawyer will do when someone comes in the door, is ask about how the plea was arrived at.

The Supreme Court decision extends the sixth amendment right to counsel to immigrants facing criminal charges. "The severity of deportation - the equivalent of banishment or exile, writes Justice John Stevens in the courts opinion, only underscores how critical it is for counsel to inform her noncitizen client that he faces a risk of deportation.

Michelle Fei, Co-Director of the Immigrant Defense Project, explains, "even though most immigrants' primary concern is their ability to stay in the U.S., they often plead guilty, unaware that the result would be permanent exile from their families and communities." The Padilla decision will change this.

What the court got right today is that deportation is such a dire consequence that more protections are really necessary, says Fei.

Page 1 of 1




Just Posted

NAM Coverage