Report from the Border: Year of Infamy
Frontera NorteSur, Commentary, Kent Paterson Posted: Dec 31, 2008
Many people in the borderlands will say good riddance to 2008. On both sides of the border, war, recession and repression were words that will almost certainly stand out in the writings of future historians recapturing a tumultuous year.
Undoubtedly, the narco war in Ciudad Juarez, Tijuana and other regions of Mexico ranked high among the top stories of the year. A staid German think tank, the Heidelberg Institute for International Conflict Research, even put Mexican narco-violence in the same category as conflicts in Colombia and the Middle East.
In Ciudad Juarez alone, approximately 1,600 people were slain. Since Dec. 1, 2006, when Mexican President Felipe Calderon came to office, more than 8,000 people have perished in narco-violence nationwide, according to the latest press accounts.
Although Ciudad Juarez has long been a violent place, several trends made this year’s violence particularly gruesome. Decapitations, public massacres and the gunning down of innocent bystanders shocked even a public accustomed to violence. As warring gangs roamed the streets, reports of kidnappings, bank robberies, arson attacks, and extortions shot through the roof.
The year also stood out for its record toll of women’s homicides. Eighty one women were reported slain by the first half of December, though some accounts put the number far higher. Like their male counterparts, most female victims were linked to gangland violence, but sex-related crimes continued to appear and young women disappear.
Few recall that the first homicide victim discovered in 2008, 20-year-old Joanna Radilla Lucero, was reportedly raped and stabbed to death.
Rolled out as the official response to narco-violence, the Mexican army’s Operation Chihuahua Together was a spectacular failure. Violence actually increased after the army entered the conflict, and some soldiers were implicated in human rights violations.
In short, what little semblance to law and order that existed in Ciudad Juarez went up in a bloody haze of smoke during the War of 2008. Not surprisingly, those with the wherewithal hightailed it of Dodge as fast as they could cross the border; perhaps thousands of Juarenses fled to the United States this year.
While the press dutifully reported the daily body counts, little discussion took place about the wider implications of the carnage. In Ciudad Juarez, for instance, thousands of families are now traumatized from experiencing the loss of loved ones or from simply the threat of becoming the next victim. Some schools have found it difficult to even function. A generation of orphans is being created, and in the case of the long-running femicides, a second generation of survivors is left with persistent emotional and psychological scars.
Across the scooped up, channeled strip of land that sometimes passes as the Big River and which provides a neat division between Mexico and the United States, many people like to pretend that they are safely removed from the disaster underway on the other side of the border.
This denial ignores the myriad family, cultural and commercial bonds that tie the borderlands together. What happens on one side inevitably reverberates on the other.
Another, little-examined development could greatly complicate the picture. El Paso will soon host a dramatic expansion of Fort Bliss. The city’s good fathers and citizens welcome the infusion of new money that thousands of soldiers and their families will inject into an always struggling economy.
But many of the newcomers, returning from wars in Iraq and Afghanistan, will struggle with demons of their own as they attempt to cope with Post Traumatic Stress Disorder (PTSD). Ironically, they will have plenty of company in the thousands of Juarenses, adults and children alike, who suffer PTSD from a war underway in their homeland, according to Mexican psychologists recently quoted in the press.
Is the Paso del Norte prepared to handle a massive, multi-generational PTSD problem stemming from wars both close to home and in distant foreign lands? What preparations are the schools taking to address the needs of children who suffer from the loss of a relative or the memories of seeing
a human being slaughtered before their very eyes? Are governments adequately budgeting for this emergency? Are they even aware of its existence? Will the Paso del Norte one day become known as PTSD Border?
Often, what is not said in the press is just as important as what is said. Many of the international press stories about Ciudad Juarez glossed over or completely ignored the other disaster, the economic one, that also wreaked havoc on the border city in 2008.
Export manufacturing, the city’ s largest legal industry, was hit hard by the United States economic collapse, with more than 25,000 workers losing their jobs in Ciudad Juarez and Chihuahua state this year.
Price increases pummeled workers who were offered a minimum wage increase of roughly 16 cents a day as the year drew to an end. In such a landscape, perhaps it is not surprising that some choose to ease their pain with poppy dreams or cocaine highs.
Ten or fifteen years ago, a popular press narrative framed Tijuana, Ciudad Juarez and Monterrey as glittering examples of the free-trade driven future of a Mexico firmly irrevocably bound to the United States and Canada. The successes of the dynamic northern Mexican cities were contrasted to the impoverished, backward regions of a southern Mexico relatively isolated from the world economy.
The norteño trio was trumpeted as the vanguard of an economic modernization that would shake Mexico out of its “cultural stupor” and begin Mexican workers on the wondrous path to the consumer middle class. In 2008, harmonization was indeed reached for workers on both sides of the border. Long part of the diet south of the border, an economic stew of declining wages, exaggerated price hikes for food and other basic necessities, credit crises, and collapsing banks became the order of the
day north of the border too.
Meanwhile, NAFTA’s Three Cities of Gold, the promised Dorados of the 21st Century, were awash in violence, crime, drugs, and corruption. Is this mere coincidence?
Which brings another issue to mind: immigration. Excluded from the North American Free Trade Agreement, the migrant question refused to go away as millions of people, uprooted by adverse economic forces and lacking legal walking papers, desperately sought refuge in the American Dream. Thousands died trying to cross the border north.
In 2008, news stories stressed how the economic crisis and tighter U.S. border controls, including a controversial wall, slowed the passage of undocumented people.
But the year ended with a solution to the fates of nearly 12 million undocumented people in the United States still blowing in the wind. As politicians largely avoided the issue, the Bush administration stepped up incarcerations and deportations of undocumented migrants.
It remains to be seen if a new administration in Washington, led by an African American elected to office with overwhelming support from Latino and other communities of color, will achieve a new immigration reform or simply put off the issue for another day.
On the border, many are already asking President-elect Obama and his incoming administration to address not only the immigration dilemma, but tackle long-neglected infrastructure needs, environmental crises, economic inequalities and educational deficits as well.
In both the United States and Mexico,labor, farm and culture activists demand the renegotiation of NAFTA, but in Mexico City the issue is off the table.
Whether the new U.S. president will act on an early campaign pledge to take a second look at the treaty is another burning question awaiting an answer in the new year.
Frontera NorteSur (FNS): on-line, U.S.-Mexico border news Center for Latin American and Border Studies New Mexico State University Las Cruces, New Mexico
Related Articles:
Violence in Mexico Forces Families to Emigrate
Violence, Rights Violations Soar in Tijuana
A Border Press Emergency
Juarez Reporter Murdered, Attacks on Journalists Intensify
Drug Traffickers Send Death Threat Via YouTube
Page
1 of 1
|
|

User Comments
John McFarlin on Jan 02, 2009 at 18:54:11 said:
The US-Mexico border is scary. I know of no other border that has such poverty on one side and affluence on the other. The place has got to be a powder keg waiting to blow. If there really is an influx of returning vets, then PTSD or not, they're going to be fighting mad if they have to watch thousands of poor cross the border, fear drug violence, protect themselves from theft.
Mexican and others who suffer peonage in their home countries have been traumatized all their lives. And while the citizens of Ciudad Juarez are undoubtedly suffering tremendously from the warfare in their city, I can't imagine how the US can help them, other than encourage the drug cartels to move their base of operations to another place on the border. Isn't that absurd?
Here's the generalizations: latin machismo is playing out as violence against women; Drug dealers are as violent as ever; American business is encouraging latinos to work as peons because American business has historically exploited labor (slavery, Chinese railway workers, immigrant farm workers, even grad students at University, ha ha). The border is dramatically dangerous. What can Obama do? I doubt he can do any thing. Bullshit walks and money talks on the border because drugs and workers are a commodity. Heck, the US can't even control narco states where it has troops--like Afganistan. You think we can really do any thing about drug violence on the border?
nativessayno on Jan 02, 2009 at 09:20:58 said:
Is it NAM's policy to edit a piece a few days after publishing it- without notations of an ommission or correction? If so, please note it is a usual journalistic practice to note a change or correction; which you have NOT done!
Since Wednesday, January 31st- you edited out the catch-phrase from this article: ...THEIR FIGHT IS YOUR FIGHT!... Why?
Brittanicus and I actually quoted this phrase from your piece in our posted replies.....Kinda creepy for you submit a piece in a Pro-immigration article and then randomly omit a given phrase such as: THEIR FIGHT IS YOUR FIGHT!
Why would you do that, and what "purple patches" do you enter then omit for optimum effects? Don't trust your writer's enough to cite corrections or changes to a submitted article? Really weird editorial standards being practiced by you in this posted article....I had actually cut-and- pasted the phrase in my earlier post.....now it has disappeared from the article today Jan 2, 2009.
For future; if you change a published article, reference a editing change or ommision, unless you want to give the impression that you alter a piece for other reasons, in which case, you are not actually presenting journalism but instead manipulated propaganda.
nativessayno on Jan 01, 2009 at 19:21:36 said:
The author cites the PTSD of returning US vets and lumps them together with children at Mexico's border towns that also develop PTSD. This is a perfect example of conflating two disparate problems and issues.
The children that suffer from stress in Mexican border towns are the sole problem of the Mexican goverment. What if anything would they do; will they do on behalf of their own citizenry and suffering children?
You are wrong about THEIR FIGHT IS YOUR FIGHT! They have their fights at home and we have ours here. How do you expect us to condone having these so mixed up together, and on who's authority?
True, it has been years of infamy at our southern border. Years that have brought us tens of millions of unwanted, unwelcomed, unnecessary "guests". Guests whose "American Dream" is born on the back of citizens and persons that seek access to billions in remittances sent to their countries of allegiance.
Your definition of infamy is not the only validated one that can be presented here. Your thesis is that we owe new immigrants. Why? Their country of origin has that responsibility. US taxpayers have burderns enough from the millions of illegal persons rsiding here- as it is; and from our current economic meltdown. The new preident's agenda can not afford to be latino country's rich nanny indefinately...or at all.
Do you really suppose that these returning vets and ordinary citizens are the less pressing concern? Extorting us into your "help the pitiful migrant" agenda is not a really a priority action plan.
I hate to see us bullied into so-called immigration "reform" that we DO NOT want. Why not take your fighting plans and spirit home instead of misapplying it here?
first/foremost on Jan 01, 2009 at 13:55:51 said:
DETAIN. DEPORT. DENY ACCESS to DE ILLEGALS.
tru amarican patriot on Jan 01, 2009 at 08:23:07 said:
stop wasting time to listen an immigration critics and demagogues and act in comprehensive and humane immigration reform.there's a way to have an immigration reform which benefits both illegals and citizens.economy needs labor! WE NEED IMMIGRATION AMNESTY NOW!
Brittanicus on Dec 31, 2008 at 18:19:13 said:
With massive unemployment their should be a moratorium on ALL IMMIGRATION, until this nation become solvent again. How can we stick more taxes on hurting citizens and resident, as at the same time giving free government handouts to illegal aliens?
-->Just like California and other Sanctuary States that are illegal alien refuge, If their politicians fail to recognize the costs of health care, education and other state government benefits, untold numbers will pour into their communities. As more and more states enact rigid employer sanction laws, they are going to pour into any state that will financially sustain their families. More and more county police departments throughout the United States, are being trained under the 247(g) federal enforcement act to arrest and detain people who cannot prove their immigration status. California has been overwhelmed and suffering the hundreds of thousands of foreign nationals from other states, whose elected officials have finally realized the tremendous financial burden.
With $47.billion budget deficit, California's governor begged along with others for a financial bailout, because of the billions of dollars involved in state welfare programs. According to the Tucson Border patrol Union, the number of illegal aliens squatting here is 37 million--not 13 million the liberal press, likes you to think. All taxpayers who are concerned with political corruption, radical open border entities, imported terrorism, gang growth, sham laws, immigrant slavery, illegal immigration, sanctuary states and cities, taxpayer costs and the special interest lobbyists should join the growing ranks of www.judicialwatch.org/ This legal watch dog group uses the power of the courts, to fight back against the propagating corruption in our society. THEIR FIGHT IS YOUR FIGHT!